English|Carte du Site
Dossiers spéciaux

Demandez au CCPP

Faire une recherche

Afin de soutenir la demande croissante, nous avons modifé la section Demandez au CCPP et l'avons rendu plus facile d'utilisation. Vous pouvez désormais sélectioner la catégorie qui vous interesse dans le menu déroulant et voir les questions qui ont déjà été posées et répondues. Vous pouvez également faire une recherche parmis les questions déjà soumises au CCPP depuis les débuts.

Questions et réponses les plus récentes

Would materials used to train Healthcare professionals prior to using a product be items to be reviewed by PAAB, or do they reflect more Continuing education materials? The trainings would be done on site by medical science liaisons.

  • Voir réponse [+]

It seems that materials that cite a product is available through the Special Access Program would be considered promotional. Are these types of materials reviewed and approved by PAAB, or are they strictly prohibited as alluded to in the Health Canada Guidance regarding special access programs? Without some notice, I don’t know how healthcare professionals know whether a product is available through SAP.


I have seen mixed messages as to whether PAAB review of prescription pharmaceutical advertising must be reviewed by PAAB. Can you confirm or refute that PAAB review is required?

  • Voir réponse [+]

If you are creating a corporate APS in a print format that lists a pharmaceutical company's products, do you also need to include some level of fair balance for those products?

  • Voir réponse [+]

We will be offering OTC product samples through a third party sampling program. In the order brochure there will be a pack shot of the sample pack, brand name and dosing. Does this need to be PAAB approved?


We have a non-prescription drug and we plan to leave coupons for patients in the doctors' offices. Do the coupons need to be PAAB approved?


Is it possible to make a “#1 reccommended” brand claim? If so, what support would be required?

  • Voir réponse [+]

We would like to produce a non-branded APS that highlights the current medical practice on using a specific class of medication. The most recent Canadian consensus guidelines (updated in 2017) support the message that this class of medication should now be offered as an option to patients undergoing continued maintenance treatment (this is a big change vs the last consensus guidelines publication from 2003). 2 Questions: 1) We assume it would be acceptable to make a claim in an APS that outlines this recommendation, given that this is from an approved, authoritative source, correct? 2) This guideline document also provides context around why their position has changed. They provide details about how this class of medication was used historically, and also outline some of the evidence that supports their new recommendation, which included reviewing 3 RCTs among other sources (note: they communicate that there is data that supports the classes superiority, but also data that challenges it). Would it be permissible to also include a balanced presentation of these additional details in our APS? If not, why? Wouldn't a consensus guidelines document be an acceptable reprint that a company sales rep could distribute to HCPs? And if so, then why would be ok for them to distribute the document that includes this information, but it wouldn't be permitted to use the content on its own in an unbranded APS if referenced accordingly and presented in a balanced and objective manner?

  • Voir réponse [+]

In the "other relevant warnings and precautions" section of the highest-level fair balance, is there a requirement to include warning/precautions about effects that were not systematically studied/evaluated and that are not class warnings. Here is an examples of what I suspect needs to be included: bullet point " seizures" if PM has "seizures" bolded followed by "xxx has not been systematically evaluated in patients with a seizure disorder. Patients with a history of seizures were excluded from clinical studies. Seizures are a potential risk with antidepressant drugs. xxx should be prescribed with caution in patients with a seizure disorder." Here is an example of what I suspect does not need to included: bullet point "cognitive and motor disturbances" if PM has "cognitive and motor disturbances" bolded followed by "The effects of xxx on the ability to drive or to operate machinery were not systematically evaluated in the xxx development program." Please advice if my assumption is correct. Thank you.

  • Voir réponse [+]

Can baseline patient demographics (not outcomes) captured by Patient Support Program enrollment be used in HCP-directed advertising, in a promotional or claim-neutral manner?

  • Voir réponse [+]
Commissaire adjoint  

Patrick Massad
Commissaire adjoint

Pour visionner le
Code d’agrément de la publicité du CCPP
cliquez ici
Le Conseil Consultatif de
Publicité Pharmaceutique
Conférences à venir

17 octobre 2018

Embaucher la bonne personne

Dîner d'affaires
Cocktail : 17 h 30
Souper : 18 h 30
Présentation : 19 h 00

Cliquez ici pour vous inscrire