PMCQ Logo
English|Carte du Site
Dossiers spéciaux

Demandez au CCPP

Faire une recherche

Afin de soutenir la demande croissante, nous avons modifé la section Demandez au CCPP et l'avons rendu plus facile d'utilisation. Vous pouvez désormais sélectioner la catégorie qui vous interesse dans le menu déroulant et voir les questions qui ont déjà été posées et répondues. Vous pouvez également faire une recherche parmis les questions déjà soumises au CCPP depuis les débuts.

Questions et réponses les plus récentes
584

Can you please explain why a claim of "Guidelines recommend..." can only contain the generic drug name, vs. brand name? Would it make a difference if the Guidelines themselves link generic and brand names?

  • Voir réponse [+]
583

A product receives an updated indication, removing some clinical use restrictions (patient type, duration, etc). Can the old and new indications be presented together in an APS? Can an APS make mention of the lifted clinical use restrictions (if they are now omitted from the TMA)? Thank you.

  • Voir réponse [+]
582

Can NBRx data be used to make market share claims, if the same principles governing TRx data were applied? Example: Arbace is the #1 dispensed hypertensive among new patients. If so, would the NBRx data need to be directionally consistent with the TRx data (ie. if Arbace is in fact not the #1 dispensed among ALL patients)?

  • Voir réponse [+]
581

For an efficacy claim, comparing head-to-head results of the study drug vs. the standard treatment, what support is required to justify the claim "significant"?

  • Voir réponse [+]
580

Hi, My question pertains to the construction of the required "Relevant warnings and precautions" section include in a fair balance section. Specifically, can the incidence of the events, for example "serious adverse events of neoplasm' or "QTc prolongation", have incidence or other clarifying information included in the fair balance section for clarification purposes so a HCP more clearly understands the context of the warnings and precautions?

  • Voir réponse [+]
579

When a disease is very rare, there is often no published Canadian specific epidemiology or incidence studies. What is PAAB's position on allowing a simple statement that the disease is 'rare'?

  • Voir réponse [+]
578

Hi PAAB: We have a new product in our pipeline that is currently undergoing approval process with Health Canada (pre-NOC). We want to do a targeted campaign to HCPs around disease state, We will not be mentioning any clinical data or clinical options. This online piece will be centered around the disease and very general information regarding disease state. Do we need PAAB approval or ASC approval alone is sufficient?

  • Voir réponse [+]
577

Hi - I understand that as per Section 6.6iv, an email informing HCPs about 'updated provincial formulary criteria for Drug X' would be considered PAAB exempt (if there were no linkage to therapeutic or promotional claims). Could you provide clarification on whether including a website link to the full formulary list of a province would still be considered exempt? Note that this formulary list contains criteria specific to Drug X.

  • Voir réponse [+]
576

We are in the process of developing a tool that will highlight a product's reimbursement program. It would state "reimbursement navigation assistance available for Product X" and would include a tear pad with necessary information to be completed by an HCP. This tear sheet would not be provided to patients, but would be faxed directly to the manufacturer. In addition, this tool would not include any product/promotional claims, only the name of the product would be mentioned. Given that messages limited to name and price are exempt from PAAB review, would "reimbursement navigation" also be considered exempt? If not, is there any way to make this tool exempt?

  • Voir réponse [+]
575

Our question is related to question no 70 which was: "The PAAB codes allows side by side comparison of non-clinical data from 2 or monographs. Would it be acceptable to use a comparative table of non-clinical data (ie. pharmacokinetics) from a review article? Extract from 5.10.2: [Information from two or more Product Monographs on products' properties7 and on instructions for use or use limitations8 may be acceptable as side-by-side presentations and in text form.]". PAAB answer: "The PAAB Code (s3.1.1) does not regard "review articles" as high level evidence to support a drug specific claim because they reflect an opinion/ summary from an author rather than actual findings of a primary study. This also applies to non-clinical claims. Our question: Does PAAB regard "Guidelines" (such as CGA guidelines) as high and appropriate level of evidence for a side-by-side comparison of use limitations? Thanks

  • Voir réponse [+]
Commissaire adjoint  

Patrick Massad
Commissaire adjoint

Pour visionner le
Code d’agrément de la publicité du CCPP
cliquez ici
Le Conseil Consultatif de
Publicité Pharmaceutique
Conférences à venir

23 janvier 2018

Mener une équipe à la victoire

Cocktail : 17 h 30
Souper : 18 h 30
Conférence : 19 h

Cliquez ici pour vous inscrire